Keyword summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Department Of Public Health results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (33,709 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Department Of Public Health is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
San Francisco Department Of Public Health
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,287
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos