Keyword summary
61%8 analyzed articles/videos4,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saikat Chakrabarti results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 3,067 hits. Analysis detected 26,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,226 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,439 of 35,675 keywords). This Saikat Chakrabarti is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Saikat Chakrabarti
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
21%Saikat Chakrabarti (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles30.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate