Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Armand Manoukian results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 2,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Armand Manoukian is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Armand Manoukian
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Armand Manoukian (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 3.8%3.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos