Keyword summary
58%2 analyzed articles/videos720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russiagate results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 3,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,513 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,677 of 37,536 keywords). This Russiagate is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Russiagate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
72%Russiagate (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,513
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos