Keyword summary
63%3 analyzed articles/videos3,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Sanctions results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 940 hits. Analysis detected 11,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,864 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (27,161 of 35,865 keywords). This Russia Sanctions is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Russia Sanctions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
25%Russia Sanctions (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,864
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos