Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Development results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,939 hits. Analysis detected 18,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,016 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (30,182 of 37,533 keywords). This Rural Development is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Rural Development
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠20%Rural Development (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles21K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos