Keyword summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royals Stadium Proposal results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 4,617 hits . Analysis detected 31,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,302 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,034 of 37,536 keywords). This Royals Stadium Proposal is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Royals Stadium Proposal
Keyword details
Total words: 50,302
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles50.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst