Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Romance Films results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.2% saturation with 2,170 hits . Analysis detected 9,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,595 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,813 of 36,755 keywords). This Romance Films is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Romance Films
Keyword details
Total words: 4,595
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 47.2% 47.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 36.3% 36.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 47.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 36.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst