Keyword summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robot Umpires results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 485 hits . Analysis detected 3,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,772 of 37,536 keywords). This Robot Umpires is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Robot Umpires
Keyword details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst