Keyword summary
11% 2 analyzed articles/videos 887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Hur results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 314 hits . Analysis detected 1,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,735 of 37,536 keywords). This Robert Hur is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Robert Hur
Keyword details
Total words: 3,104
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst