BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 444 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,554 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  A federal appeals court has rejected a request by Joe Biden to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts of his interviews with a memoir ghostwriter before he was elected president. 
A divided three-judge panel from the U.S. 
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suspended its decision until Aug. 3 to allow more time for Biden to consider another appeal. 
The panel’s 2-1 ruling late Monday found there is a “substantial” public interest in disclosing the material that Biden wants to keep under wraps. 
Redactions to the recordings would help protect Biden’s privacy, the majority noted. 
“We conclude that any remaining incursion on personal privacy from disclosure of the now-redacted materials likely does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure,” the ruling says. 
Judge Florence Pan, who was nominated by Biden, a Democrat, wrote a dissenting opinion in which she said Biden has shown a “substantial privacy interest” in keeping the material hidden. 
“The conversations at issue took place in Biden’s home, and the recordings of them were obtained by the government in the course of a criminal investigation that did not lead to an indictment,” she wrote. 
The appeal also was heard by D.C. 
Circuit Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan and Judge Gregory Katsas. 
Srinivasan was nominated by President Barack Obama, a Democrat who chose Biden as his vice president. 
Katsas was nominated by President Donald Trump, a Republican who as president lost to Biden in 2020 but was elected again to the White House in 2024. 
Mark Zwonitzer, who worked with Biden on two memoirs, 2007’s “Promises to Keep” and 2017’s “Promise Me, Dad,” interviewed him at his home in 2016 and 2017. 
Biden’s lawyers say the conversations were candid, personal and intended to remain private. 
Biden appealed after U.S. 
District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated by Trump, ruled in June that the public interest in the material outweighed whatever privacy rights Biden had. 
Pan noted that the majority is effectively ruling in favor of immediately disclosing the material by denying Biden’s request for an injunction pending appeal. 
“That, of course, will moot this case,” she wrote. 
Biden’s lawyers say the conversations were candid, personal and intended to remain private. 
Biden appealed after U.S. 
District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated by Trump, ruled in June that the public interest in the material outweighed whatever privacy rights Biden had. 
Pan noted that the majority is effectively ruling in favor of immediately disclosing the material by denying Biden’s request for an injunction pending appeal. 
“That, of course, will moot this case,” she wrote. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.7%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.9%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 2.4%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.4%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 7.7%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.4%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Michael Kunzelman: 4.4%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias10.8%This article: 5.9%Michael Kunzelman: 0.9%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.7%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 5.7%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.5%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.9%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.3%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 3.8%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.1%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 2.3%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.8%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 4.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 4.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Kunzelman: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

444 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker30%attributed speech313writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 30 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 24 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 24 words • 0.0% coverageFlorence Pan • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Florence Pan

37%flagged-word coverage
131 attributed words100% of attributed speech8.3% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.