Keyword summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riq Woolen results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Recency Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 608 hits . Analysis detected 4,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,653 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,989 of 37,536 keywords). This Riq Woolen is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Riq Woolen
Keyword details
Total words: 4,653
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst