Keyword summary
49%3 analyzed articles/videos2,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Hanania results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,564 hits. Analysis detected 10,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,548 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,614 of 37,533 keywords). This Richard Hanania is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Richard Hanania
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Richard Hanania (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,548
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos