Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reparations results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 742 hits . Analysis detected 7,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,820 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,121 of 37,536 keywords). This Reparations is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Reparations
Keyword details
Total words: 9,820
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst