Keyword summary
58%4 analyzed articles/videos2,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rent Guidelines Board results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,114 hits. Analysis detected 8,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,288 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,178 of 35,444 keywords). This Rent Guidelines Board is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Rent Guidelines Board
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
18%Rent Guidelines Board (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,288
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate