Keyword summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Parks & Gardens results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,980 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (36,722 of 56,339 keywords). This Regional Parks & Gardens is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Regional Parks & Gardens
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
35%Regional Parks & Gardens (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,980
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos