Keyword summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regenerative Farming results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,101 hits . Analysis detected 7,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,305 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,945 of 37,536 keywords). This Regenerative Farming is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Regenerative Farming
Keyword details
Total words: 6,305
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst