Keyword summary
67% 3 analyzed articles/videos 872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconciliation Process results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 911 hits . Analysis detected 9,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,546 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (21,257 of 34,832 keywords). This Reconciliation Process is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Reconciliation Process
Keyword details
Total words: 8,546
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst