Keyword summary
88% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raphael Warnock results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 2,435 hits . Analysis detected 16,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,780 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,130 of 35,713 keywords). This Raphael Warnock is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Raphael Warnock
Keyword details
Total words: 10,780
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst