Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raphael G. Warnock results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,032 hits . Analysis detected 7,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,571 of 6,628 authors). This Raphael G. Warnock is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Raphael G. Warnock
Author details
Total words: 4,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 20.2% 20.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst