Keyword summary
43%3 analyzed articles/videos1,813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ranch Dressing results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Indoctrination, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,113 hits. Analysis detected 9,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,057 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,246 of 35,696 keywords). This Ranch Dressing is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Ranch Dressing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
33%Ranch Dressing (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,057
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos