Keyword summary
0% 17 analyzed articles/videos 11,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quinton Lucas results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 4,683 hits . Analysis detected 33,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,482 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (30,500 of 34,426 keywords). This Quinton Lucas is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Quinton Lucas
Keyword details
Total words: 44,482
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score16 analyzed articles44.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst