Keyword summary
25% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,066 hits . Analysis detected 8,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,131 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,192 of 37,536 keywords). This Public Policy is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Public Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 13,131
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst