Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Palestinian Protest results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 647 hits. Analysis detected 4,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,950 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (31,945 of 35,637 keywords). This Pro Palestinian Protest is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Pro Palestinian Protest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
11%Pro Palestinian Protest (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate