Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Life Movement results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,155 hits. Analysis detected 7,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (15,617 of 35,444 keywords). This Pro Life Movement is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Pro Life Movement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
56%Pro Life Movement (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos