Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Election Of results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 517 hits . Analysis detected 2,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (16,476 of 34,692 keywords). This Presidential Election Of is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Presidential Election Of
Keyword details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst