Keyword summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prescribed Burns results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 931 hits . Analysis detected 9,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,759 of 37,536 keywords). This Prescribed Burns is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Prescribed Burns
Keyword details
Total words: 9,888
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst