Keyword summary
50% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Grid results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,360 hits . Analysis detected 10,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,007 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,484 of 36,957 keywords). This Power Grid is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Power Grid
Keyword details
Total words: 14,007
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst