Keyword summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Port Of San Francisco results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 434 hits . Analysis detected 2,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,813 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,497 of 37,536 keywords). This Port Of San Francisco is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Port Of San Francisco
Keyword details
Total words: 3,813
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst