Keyword summary
28% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Science results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,047 hits . Analysis detected 8,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,798 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,642 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Science is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Political Science
Keyword details
Total words: 11,798
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst