Keyword summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Oversight results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (28,895 of 37,536 keywords). This Police Oversight is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Police Oversight
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠23%Police Oversight (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos