Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pnas results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (23,786 of 37,536 keywords). This Pnas is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Pnas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠37%Pnas (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos