Keyword summary
55% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Thiel results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,874 hits . Analysis detected 24,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,202 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,177 of 37,536 keywords). This Peter Thiel is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Peter Thiel
Keyword details
Total words: 22,202
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst