Keyword summary
50%2 analyzed articles/videos821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Kyle results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 5,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,691 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,928 of 37,536 keywords). This Peter Kyle is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Peter Kyle
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Peter Kyle (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,691
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos