Keyword summary
10%1 analyzed article/video687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pet Overpopulation results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 905 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (36,441 of 56,033 keywords). This Pet Overpopulation is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Pet Overpopulation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
35%Pet Overpopulation (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos