Keyword summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pet Overpopulation results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 905 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (36,441 of 56,033 keywords). This Pet Overpopulation is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Pet Overpopulation
Keyword details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst