Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pepper Spray results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,773 hits. Analysis detected 9,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (14,049 of 37,536 keywords). This Pepper Spray is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Pepper Spray
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠63%Pepper Spray (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,160
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 24.8%24.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos