Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Foldi results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 499 hits . Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,681 of 37,450 keywords). This Paul Foldi is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Paul Foldi
Keyword details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.8% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.8% 23.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst