Keyword summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Infurna results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 1,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,952 of 37,533 keywords). This Patrick Infurna is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Patrick Infurna
Keyword details
Total words: 2,028
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst