Keyword summary
7%2 analyzed articles/videos2,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Party For Socialism And Liberation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,284 hits. Analysis detected 5,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,338 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (31,199 of 35,766 keywords). This Party For Socialism And Liberation is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Party For Socialism And Liberation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
13%Party For Socialism And Liberation (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510012.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos