Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parks & Recreation results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,514 of 37,536 keywords). This Parks & Recreation is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Parks & Recreation
Keyword details
Total words: 2,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst