Keyword summary
39% 2 analyzed articles/videos 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pandemics results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 6,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,666 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (23,823 of 36,112 keywords). This Pandemics is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Pandemics
Keyword details
Total words: 6,666
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst