Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Oppenheimer results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,622 hits . Analysis detected 13,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,990 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,666 keywords). This Oppenheimer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Oppenheimer
Keyword details
Total words: 17,990
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst