Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operation Southern Spear results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,394 hits . Analysis detected 9,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,480 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,480 of 35,190 keywords). This Operation Southern Spear is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Operation Southern Spear
Keyword details
Total words: 12,480
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst