Keyword summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 10,654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Safety Act results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 6,122 hits . Analysis detected 33,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,624 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,369 of 34,426 keywords). This Online Safety Act is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Online Safety Act
Keyword details
Total words: 37,624
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles37.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst