Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Olympic Games results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 3,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,833 keywords). This Olympic Games is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Olympic Games
Keyword details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst