Keyword summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Old City results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 827 hits . Analysis detected 3,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (14,182 of 35,014 keywords). This Old City is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Old City
Keyword details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst