Keyword summary
60%2 analyzed articles/videos905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oklahoma City results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 708 hits. Analysis detected 3,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (39,128 of 55,327 keywords). This Oklahoma City is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Oklahoma City
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
30%Oklahoma City (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,404
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate