Keyword summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Odessa results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 1,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (40,577 of 55,969 keywords). This Odessa is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Odessa
Keyword details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst