Author summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Cobler results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 3,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,797 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,038 of 6,364 authors). This Paul Cobler is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Paul Cobler
Author details
Total words: 4,797
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst