Keyword summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nv Energy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 3,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,278 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (41,252 of 56,297 keywords). This Nv Energy is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Nv Energy
Keyword details
Total words: 6,278
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst